https://canada-dating.pr-linktausch.de/
https://canada-dating.tanzaniadirectory.info/
https://canada-dating.villalovaria.it/
https://canada-dating.websitejudge.nl/
https://canada-dating.ingagenetworks.com/
https://canada-dating.seowebdirectory.info/

They’re more concerned about the job than their personal lives which ultimately falls apart. It should who with Pacino being on his Third marriage. I think the whole point of De Niro’s character towards the end was wanting to escape and change, but he was too hard wired not to, he had a chance if he’d have just kept going to the airport, he was almost out and had a real chance at a normal life, baseballs and shit

I completely agree with you on sacrifice and compromise.

Dagny T. on November 15, 2007 3:40 pm
I love that movie.

I think the decision to play by absolute rules should really depend on one’s priorities. With respect to dating/relationships - each approach has its own risks and rewards. If you’ve got ironclad dealbreakers, you risk possibly missing out on something amazing, for a so-called dealbreaker that might not be that important in the long run.

And if you’re more flexible, you risk letting someone take advantage of you. Here, the real question is how confident are you, that you could recover?

I think I’ve got a mixed approach, personally - I try to overlook at least a few instances of “dealbreaking” before I give up altogether.

jg on November 15, 2007 8:59 pm